Download：
Figures of the Article
-
![]()
Optimal government decision-making under the benchmark scenario. (a) Data represent the changes in social welfare. (b) Data represent the changes in the automakers’ profit.
-
![]()
The impact of the carbon quota ratio on enterprise decisions. Data represent the impact of governments’ carbon quota ratio decisions on automaker decisions.
-
![]()
Impact of e1 ande2 on CT introduction timing and carbon quota ratio. Data represent the impact of the single-vehicle carbon emissions of NEVs and CFVs on the optimal CT introduction timing and carbon quota ratio. -
![]()
Impact of pc andp0 on CT introduction timing and carbon quota ratio. Data represent the impact of the carbon price and the initial profit of NEVs on government decisions. -
![]()
The impact of n on CT introduction timing and carbon quota ratio. Data represent the impact of consumers’ low-carbon preference levels (n ) on the optimal CT introduction timing and carbon quota ratio.
Related articles
-
2024, 54(10): 1002. DOI: 10.52396/JUSTC-2022-0144
-
2023, 53(8): 0806. DOI: 10.52396/JUSTC-2022-0093
-
2021, 51(9): 690-698. DOI: 10.52396/JUST-2021-0175
-
2021, 51(1): 53-64. DOI: 10.52396/JUST-2020-0024
-
2020, 50(7): 906-911. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2778.2020.07.006
-
2018, 48(6): 458-466. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2778.2018.06.004
-
2017, 47(11): 929-939. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2778.2017.11.008
-
2017, 47(8): 695-698. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2778.2017.08.009
-
2017, 47(6): 524-529. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2778.2017.06.011
-
2014, 44(10): 795-803. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2778.2014.10.001
