• 中文核心期刊要目总览
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)
  • 中国科技论文与引文数据库(CSTPCD)
  • 中国学术期刊文摘数据库(CSAD)
  • 中国学术期刊(网络版)(CNKI)
  • 中文科技期刊数据库
  • 万方数据知识服务平台
  • 中国超星期刊域出版平台
  • 国家科技学术期刊开放平台
  • 荷兰文摘与引文数据库(SCOPUS)
  • 日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(JST)

如何提升ESG基金的绩效水平? ——基于DEA-Malmquist生产率指数与fsQCA方法

How can ESG funds improve their performance? Based on the DEA-Malmquist productivity index and fsQCA method

  • 摘要: 在我国,ESG基金尚处于发展初期,如何提升其绩效水平成为亟待解决的问题。以2018~2021年的26支ESG基金为研究对象,运用DEA-Malmquist生产率指数方法分别从静态和动态两个层面对ESG基金绩效进行评价,并应用模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)方法探究ESG基金的绩效提升路径。总体来看,ESG基金绩效表现良好,但不同基金之间差异较大。ESG基金的全要素生产率在研究期间内呈现小幅下降趋势。提升ESG基金绩效的路径有三种:一是在提高基金规模的前提下,保持较低的持股集中度并尽可能降低调仓频率;二是在提高基金规模的前提下,分散投资ESG评分高的标的;三是在提高基金规模的前提下,长期持有ESG评分高的标的。根据实证分析结果,提出了完善ESG评级体系、稳步扩大ESG基金市场规模、基金经理逐步优化投资策略的建议。

     

    Abstract: In China, ESG funds are still in the early stage of development, and how to improve their performance level has become an urgent problem. Based on 26 ESG funds in 2018–2021, we use the DEA-Malmquist productivity index method to evaluate the performance of ESG funds at two levels, static and dynamic, and apply the fsQCA approach to explore the performance improvement path of ESG funds. Overall, ESG funds perform well, but there are significant differences among them. The total factor productivity of ESG funds shows a decreasing trend during the study period. There are three paths to improve the performance of ESG funds. The 1st path is to maintain a low concentration of holdings and reduce the frequency of fund position adjustments based on increasing fund size. The 2nd path is to diversify into stocks with high ESG scores based on increasing fund size. The 3rd path is to hold stocks with high ESG scores for a long time based on increasing fund size. Concerning the results of the empirical analysis, it proposes to improve the ESG rating system, broaden the market scale of ESG funds at a steady gait, and gradually optimize fund managers’ investment strategies.

     

/

返回文章
返回