ISSN 0253-2778

CN 34-1054/N

open
Free to Publish. Free to Read.
Open AccessOpen Access JUSTC Invited Reviews

Structural self-reconstruction and synchrotron radiation characterization of oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysts

  • 1.

    National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230029, China

  • 2.

    Institute of Energy, Hefei Comprehensive Nation Science Center, Hefei 230031

Cite this:
https://doi.org/10.52396/JUST-2021-0193
  • Received Date: 01 September 2021
  • Rev Recd Date: 18 October 2021
  • Publish Date: 30 November 2021
    Abstract

  • Abstract

    Self-reconstruction during oxygen evolution reaction (OER) process is considered to be the key to highly active catalysts, while tracking the dynamic changes of catalysts during OER process and identifying the true active sites are challenging. Synchrotron radiation characterizations can obtain the local atomic coordination environment and electron information of specific elements in materials. In particular, in-situ characterization methods can monitor the dynamic evolution of surface oxidation state and local atomic structure transformation under working conditions, which can promote the fundamental understanding of the reaction mechanism. In this review, we discuss recent advances and propose some perspectives in self-reconstruction of OER electrocatalysts, which mainly summarizes the fundamental origin of self-reconstruction behavior and the application of in-situ synchrotron radiation characterization technology to track the dynamic process of self-reconstruction process and to identify the true active sites. Finally, we put forward some challenges and prospects for the development and promotion of self-reconstruction of OER electrocatalysts, hoping to provide guidance for the rational design of advanced OER electrocatalysts.

    Abstract

    Self-reconstruction during oxygen evolution reaction (OER) process is considered to be the key to highly active catalysts, while tracking the dynamic changes of catalysts during OER process and identifying the true active sites are challenging. Synchrotron radiation characterizations can obtain the local atomic coordination environment and electron information of specific elements in materials. In particular, in-situ characterization methods can monitor the dynamic evolution of surface oxidation state and local atomic structure transformation under working conditions, which can promote the fundamental understanding of the reaction mechanism. In this review, we discuss recent advances and propose some perspectives in self-reconstruction of OER electrocatalysts, which mainly summarizes the fundamental origin of self-reconstruction behavior and the application of in-situ synchrotron radiation characterization technology to track the dynamic process of self-reconstruction process and to identify the true active sites. Finally, we put forward some challenges and prospects for the development and promotion of self-reconstruction of OER electrocatalysts, hoping to provide guidance for the rational design of advanced OER electrocatalysts.
    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(68)
  • [1]
    Schlögl R. The role of chemistry in the energy challenge. ChemSusChem. 2010, 3(2): 209-222.
    [2]
    Nocera D G. Solar fuels and solar chemicals industry. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2017, 50(3): 616-619.
    [3]
    Hunter B M, Gray H B, Müller A M. Earth-abundant heterogeneous water oxidation catalysts. Chemical Reviews. 2016, 116(22): 14120-14136.
    [4]
    Vukovi M. Oxygen evolution reaction on thermally treated iridium oxide films. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry. 1987, 17(4): 737-745.
    [5]
    Amiri M, Fallahi M, Bezaatpour A, et al. Solution processable Cu(II)macrocycle for the formation of Cu2O thin film on indium tin oxide and its application for water oxidation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2018, 122(29): 16510-16518.
    [6]
    Zhang J, Xia Z, Dai L. Carbon-based electrocatalysts for advanced energy conversion and storage. Science Advances. 2015, 1(7): e1500564.
    [7]
    Lee Y, Suntivich J, May K J, et al. Synthesis and activities of rutile IrO2 and RuO2nanoparticles for oxygen evolution in acid and alkaline solutions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 2012, 3(3): 399-404.
    [8]
    Reier T, Oezaslan M, Strasser P. Electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction (OER) on Ru, Ir, and Pt Catalysts: A Comparative study of nanoparticles and bulk materials. ACS Catalysis. 2012, 2(8): 1765-1772.
    [9]
    Song F, Bai L, Moysiadou A, et al. Transition metal oxides as electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction in alkaline solutions: An application-inspired renaissance. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2018, 140(25): 7748-7759.
    [10]
    Ahmed M S, Choi B, Kim Y. Development of highly Active bifunctional electrocatalyst using Co3O4 on carbon nanotubes for oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution. Scientific Reports. 2018, 8(1): 2543.
    [11]
    Liu Y, Wu J, Hackenberg K P, et al. Self-optimizing, highly surface-active layered metal dichalcogenide catalysts for hydrogen evolution. Nature Energy. 2017, 2(9): 17127.
    [12]
    Fabbri E, Nachtegaal M, Binninger T, et al. Dynamic surface self-reconstruction is the key of highly active perovskite nano-electrocatalysts for water splitting. Nature Materials. 2017, 16(9): 925-931.
    [13]
    Cao D, Liu D, Chen S, et al. Operando X-ray spectroscopy visualizing the chameleon-like structural reconstruction on an oxygen evolution electrocatalyst. Energy & Environmental Science. 2021, 14(2): 906-915.
    [14]
    Cao L, Luo Q, Chen J, et al. Dynamic oxygen adsorption on single-atomic Ruthenium catalyst with high performance for acidic oxygen evolution reaction. Nature Communications. 2019, 10(1): 4849.
    [15]
    Zhu Y, Kuo T, Li Y, et al. Emerging dynamic structure of electrocatalysts unveiled by in situ X-ray diffraction/absorption spectroscopy. Energy & Environmental Science. 2021, 14(4): 1928-1958.
    [16]
    Cao D, Moses O A, Sheng B, et al. Anomalous self-optimization of sulfate ions for boosted oxygen evolution reaction. Science Bulletin. 2021, 66(6): 553-561.
    [17]
    Hong W T, Risch M, Stoerzinger K A, et al. Toward the rational design of non-precious transition metal oxides for oxygen electrocatalysis. Energy & Environmental Science. 2015, 8(5): 1404-1427.
    [18]
    Zhu Y P, Guo C, Zheng Y, et al. Surface and interface engineering of noble-metal-free electrocatalysts for efficient energy conversion processes. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2017, 50(4): 915-923.
    [19]
    Song F, Schenk K, Hu X. A nanoporous oxygen evolution catalyst synthesized by selective electrochemical etching of perovskite hydroxide CoSn(OH)6 nanocubes. Energy & Environmental Science. 2016, 9(2): 473-477.
    [20]
    Nam D, Bushuyev O S, Li J, et al. Metal-organic frameworks mediate Cu coordination for selective CO2electroreduction. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2018, 140(36): 11378-11386.
    [21]
    Fabbri E, Abbott D F, Nachtegaal M, et al. Operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy: A powerful tool toward water splitting catalyst development. Current Opinion in Electrochemistry. 2017, 5(1): 20-26.
    [22]
    May K J, Carlton C E, Stoerzinger K A, et al. Influence of oxygen evolution during water oxidation on the surface of perovskite oxide catalysts. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 2012, 3(22): 3264-3270.
    [23]
    Wygant B R, Kawashima K, Mullins C B. Catalyst or precatalyst? The effect of oxidation on transition metal carbide, pnictide, and chalcogenide oxygen evolution catalysts. ACS Energy Letters. 2018, 3(12): 2956-2966.
    [24]
    Seh Z W, Kibsgaard J, Dickens C F, et al. Combining theory and experiment in electrocatalysis: Insights into materials design. Science. 2017, 355(6321): d4998.
    [25]
    Jiang H, He Q, Zhang Y, et al. Structural self-reconstruction of catalysts in electrocatalysis. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2018, 51(11): 2968-2977.
    [26]
    Li Y, Du X, Huang J, et al. Recent progress on surface reconstruction of earth-abundant electrocatalysts for water oxidation. Small. 2019, 15(35): 1901980.
    [27]
    Shan J, Zheng Y, Shi B, et al. Regulating electrocatalysts via surface and interface engineering for acidic water electrooxidation. ACS Energy Letters. 2019, 4(11): 2719-2730.
    [28]
    Feng C, Faheem M B, Fu J, et al. Fe-based electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction: progress and perspectives. ACS Catalysis. 2020, 10(7): 4019-4047.
    [29]
    Dionigi F, Strasser P. NiFe-based (Oxy)hydroxide catalysts for oxygen evolution reaction in non-acidic electrolytes. Advanced Energy Materials. 2016, 6(23): 1600621.
    [30]
    Zou S, Burke M S, Kast M G, et al. Fe (Oxy)hydroxide oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysis: Intrinsic activity and the roles of electrical conductivity, substrate, and dissolution. Chemistry of Materials. 2015, 27(23): 8011-8020.
    [31]
    Smith A M, Trotochaud L, Burke M S, et al. Contributions to activity enhancement via Fe incorporation in Ni-(oxy)hydroxide/borate catalysts for near-neutral pH oxygen evolution. Chemical Communications. 2015, 51(25): 5261-5263.
    [32]
    Xu Q, Jiang H, Duan X, et al. Fluorination-enabled reconstruction of NiFe electrocatalysts for efficient water oxidation. Nano Letters. 2021, 21(1): 492-499.
    [33]
    Wang Y, Zhu Y, Zhao S, et al. Anion etching for accessing rapid and deep self-reconstruction of precatalysts for water oxidation. Matter. 2020, 3(6): 2124-2137.
    [34]
    Gao M Y, Sun C B, Lei H, et al. Nitrate-induced and in situ electrochemical activation synthesis of oxygen deficiencies-rich nickel/nickel (oxy)hydroxide hybrid films for enhanced electrocatalytic water splitting. Nanoscale. 2018, 10(37): 17546-17551.
    [35]
    Gao M, Zheng Y, Jiang J, et al. Pyrite-Type Nanomaterials for advanced electrocatalysis. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2017, 50(9): 2194-2204.
    [36]
    You B, Sun Y. Innovative strategies for electrocatalytic water splitting. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2018, 51(7): 1571-1580.
    [37]
    Kuznetsov D A, Han B, Yu Y, et al. Tuning redox transitions via inductive effect in metal oxides and complexes, and implications in oxygen electrocatalysis. Joule. 2018, 2(2): 225-244.
    [38]
    Hu C, Ma Q, Hung S, et al. In Situ Electrochemical production of ultrathin nickel nanosheets for hydrogen evolution electrocatalysis. Chem. 2017, 3(1): 122-133.
    [39]
    Gao J, Xu C, Hung S, et al. Breaking Long-range order in iridium oxide by alkali ion for efficient water oxidation. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2019, 141(7): 3014-3023.
    [40]
    Chen W, Wang H, Li Y, et al. In situ electrochemical oxidation tuning of transition metal disulfides to oxides for enhanced water oxidation. ACS Central Science. 2015, 1(5): 244-251.
    [41]
    Zuo Y, Liu Y, Li J, et al. In situ electrochemical oxidation of Cu2S into CuO nanowires as a durable and efficient electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution reaction. Chemistry of Materials. 2019, 31(18): 7732-7743.
    [42]
    Selvam N C S, Lee J, Choi G H, et al. MXene supported CoxAy (A = OH, P, Se) electrocatalysts for overall water splitting: unveiling the role of anions in intrinsic activity and stability. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2019, 7(48): 27383-27393.
    [43]
    Chen W, Liu Y, Li Y, et al. In situ electrochemically derived nanoporous oxides from transition metal dichalcogenides for active oxygen evolution Catalysts. Nano Letters. 2016, 16(12): 7588-7596.
    [44]
    Liu X, Ni K, Wen B, et al. Deep reconstruction of nickel-based precatalysts for water oxidation catalysis. ACS Energy Letters. 2019, 4(11): 2585-2592.
    [45]
    You B, Sun Y. Hierarchically porous nickel sulfide multifunctional superstructures. Advanced Energy Materials. 2016, 6(7): 1502333.
    [46]
    Qiu Z, Tai C, Niklasson G A, et al. Direct observation of active catalyst surface phases and the effect of dynamic self-optimization in NiFe-layered double hydroxides for alkaline water splitting. Energy & Environmental Science. 2019, 12(2): 572-581.
    [47]
    Pi Y, Xu Y, Li L, et al. Selective surface reconstruction of a defective iridium-based catalyst for high-efficiency water splitting. Advanced Functional Materials. 2020, 30(43): 2004375.
    [48]
    Xu W, Cao D, Moses O A, et al. Probing self-optimization of carbon support in oxygen evolution reaction. Nano Research. 2021.
    [49]
    Sheng B, Cao D, Shou H, et al. Support induced phase engineering toward superior electrocatalyst. Nano Research. 2021.
    [50]
    Li S, Li Z, Ma R, et al. A glass-ceramic with accelerated surface reconstruction toward the efficient oxygen evolution reaction. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2021, 60(7): 3773-3780.
    [51]
    Liu X, Ni K, Wen B, et al. Deep reconstruction of nickel-based precatalysts for water oxidation catalysis. ACS Energy Letters. 2019, 4(11): 2585-2592.
    [52]
    Liu X, Meng J, Ni K, et al. Complete reconstruction of hydrate pre-catalysts for ultrastable water electrolysis in industrial-concentration alkali media. Cell Reports Physical Science. 2020, 1(11): 100241.
    [53]
    Cao D, Sheng B, Qi Z, et al. Self-optimizing iron phosphorus oxide for stable hydrogen evolution at high current. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2021, 298: 120559.
    [54]
    He W, Liberman I, Rozenberg I, et al. Electrochemically driven cation exchange enables the rational design of active CO2 reduction electrocatalysts. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2020, 59(21): 8262-8269.
    [55]
    Wang X T, Ouyang T, Wang L, et al. Surface reorganization on electrochemically-induced Zn-Ni-Co spinel oxides for enhanced oxygen electrocatalysis. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2020, 59(16): 6492-6499.
    [56]
    Li W, Li M, Hu Y, et al. Synchrotron-based X-ray absorption fine structures, X-ray diffraction, and X-ray microscopy techniques applied in the study of lithium secondary batteries. Small Methods. 2018, 2(8): 1700341.
    [57]
    Sun Z, Liu Q, Yao T, et al. X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy in nanomaterials. Science China Materials. 2015, 58(4): 313-341.
    [58]
    Jiang H, He Q, Li X, et al. Tracking structural self-reconstruction and Identifying true active sites toward cobalt oxychloride precatalyst of oxygen evolution reaction. Advanced Materials. 2019, 31(8): 1805127.
    [59]
    Song S, Zhou J, Su X, et al. Operando X-ray spectroscopic tracking of self-reconstruction for anchored nanoparticles as high-performance electrocatalysts towards oxygen evolution. Energy & Environmental Science. 2018, 11(10): 2945-2953.
    [60]
    Xiao Z, Huang Y, Dong C, et al. Operando identification of the dynamic behavior of oxygen vacancy-rich Co3O4 for oxygen evolution reaction. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2020, 142(28): 12087-12095.
    [61]
    Wu T, Sun S, Song J, et al. Iron-facilitated dynamic active-site generation on spinel CoAl2O4 with self-termination of surface reconstruction for water oxidation. Nature Catalysis. 2019, 2(9): 763-772.
    [62]
    Jiang K, Luo M, Peng M, et al. Dynamic active-site generation of atomic iridium stabilized on nanoporous metal phosphides for water oxidation. Nature Communications. 2020, 11(1).
    [63]
    Ye J, Jiang Y, Sheng T, et al. In-situ FTIR spectroscopic studies of electrocatalytic reactions and processes. Nano Energy. 2016, 29: 414-427.
    [64]
    Cheng W, Zhao X, Su H, et al. Lattice-strained metal-organic-framework arrays for bifunctional oxygen electrocatalysis. Nature Energy. 2019, 4(2): 115-122.
    [65]
    Su H, Zhao X, Cheng W, et al. Hetero-N-coordinated Co single sites with high turnover frequency for efficient electrocatalytic oxygen evolution in an acidic medium. ACS Energy Letters. 2019, 4(8): 1816-1822.
    [66]
    Gong Z, Yang Y. The application of synchrotron X-ray techniques to the study of rechargeable batteries. Journal of Energy Chemistry. 2018, 27(6): 1566-1583.
    [67]
    Zhang S, Wang W, Hu F, et al. 2D CoOOH sheet-encapsulated Ni2P into tubular arrays realizing 1000 mA cm-2-level-current-density hydrogen evolution Over 100 h in neutral water. Nano-Micro Letters. 2020, 12(1): 140.
    [68]
    Liu Y, Liang X, Gu L, et al. Corrosion engineering towards efficient oxygen evolution electrodes with stable catalytic activity for over 6000 hours. Nature Communications. 2018, 9(1): 2609.
    • Supplements(0)
    • Related Articles
    • Track Citations
  • 加载中

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    [1]
    Schlögl R. The role of chemistry in the energy challenge. ChemSusChem. 2010, 3(2): 209-222.
    [2]
    Nocera D G. Solar fuels and solar chemicals industry. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2017, 50(3): 616-619.
    [3]
    Hunter B M, Gray H B, Müller A M. Earth-abundant heterogeneous water oxidation catalysts. Chemical Reviews. 2016, 116(22): 14120-14136.
    [4]
    Vukovi M. Oxygen evolution reaction on thermally treated iridium oxide films. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry. 1987, 17(4): 737-745.
    [5]
    Amiri M, Fallahi M, Bezaatpour A, et al. Solution processable Cu(II)macrocycle for the formation of Cu2O thin film on indium tin oxide and its application for water oxidation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2018, 122(29): 16510-16518.
    [6]
    Zhang J, Xia Z, Dai L. Carbon-based electrocatalysts for advanced energy conversion and storage. Science Advances. 2015, 1(7): e1500564.
    [7]
    Lee Y, Suntivich J, May K J, et al. Synthesis and activities of rutile IrO2 and RuO2nanoparticles for oxygen evolution in acid and alkaline solutions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 2012, 3(3): 399-404.
    [8]
    Reier T, Oezaslan M, Strasser P. Electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction (OER) on Ru, Ir, and Pt Catalysts: A Comparative study of nanoparticles and bulk materials. ACS Catalysis. 2012, 2(8): 1765-1772.
    [9]
    Song F, Bai L, Moysiadou A, et al. Transition metal oxides as electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction in alkaline solutions: An application-inspired renaissance. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2018, 140(25): 7748-7759.
    [10]
    Ahmed M S, Choi B, Kim Y. Development of highly Active bifunctional electrocatalyst using Co3O4 on carbon nanotubes for oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution. Scientific Reports. 2018, 8(1): 2543.
    [11]
    Liu Y, Wu J, Hackenberg K P, et al. Self-optimizing, highly surface-active layered metal dichalcogenide catalysts for hydrogen evolution. Nature Energy. 2017, 2(9): 17127.
    [12]
    Fabbri E, Nachtegaal M, Binninger T, et al. Dynamic surface self-reconstruction is the key of highly active perovskite nano-electrocatalysts for water splitting. Nature Materials. 2017, 16(9): 925-931.
    [13]
    Cao D, Liu D, Chen S, et al. Operando X-ray spectroscopy visualizing the chameleon-like structural reconstruction on an oxygen evolution electrocatalyst. Energy & Environmental Science. 2021, 14(2): 906-915.
    [14]
    Cao L, Luo Q, Chen J, et al. Dynamic oxygen adsorption on single-atomic Ruthenium catalyst with high performance for acidic oxygen evolution reaction. Nature Communications. 2019, 10(1): 4849.
    [15]
    Zhu Y, Kuo T, Li Y, et al. Emerging dynamic structure of electrocatalysts unveiled by in situ X-ray diffraction/absorption spectroscopy. Energy & Environmental Science. 2021, 14(4): 1928-1958.
    [16]
    Cao D, Moses O A, Sheng B, et al. Anomalous self-optimization of sulfate ions for boosted oxygen evolution reaction. Science Bulletin. 2021, 66(6): 553-561.
    [17]
    Hong W T, Risch M, Stoerzinger K A, et al. Toward the rational design of non-precious transition metal oxides for oxygen electrocatalysis. Energy & Environmental Science. 2015, 8(5): 1404-1427.
    [18]
    Zhu Y P, Guo C, Zheng Y, et al. Surface and interface engineering of noble-metal-free electrocatalysts for efficient energy conversion processes. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2017, 50(4): 915-923.
    [19]
    Song F, Schenk K, Hu X. A nanoporous oxygen evolution catalyst synthesized by selective electrochemical etching of perovskite hydroxide CoSn(OH)6 nanocubes. Energy & Environmental Science. 2016, 9(2): 473-477.
    [20]
    Nam D, Bushuyev O S, Li J, et al. Metal-organic frameworks mediate Cu coordination for selective CO2electroreduction. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2018, 140(36): 11378-11386.
    [21]
    Fabbri E, Abbott D F, Nachtegaal M, et al. Operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy: A powerful tool toward water splitting catalyst development. Current Opinion in Electrochemistry. 2017, 5(1): 20-26.
    [22]
    May K J, Carlton C E, Stoerzinger K A, et al. Influence of oxygen evolution during water oxidation on the surface of perovskite oxide catalysts. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 2012, 3(22): 3264-3270.
    [23]
    Wygant B R, Kawashima K, Mullins C B. Catalyst or precatalyst? The effect of oxidation on transition metal carbide, pnictide, and chalcogenide oxygen evolution catalysts. ACS Energy Letters. 2018, 3(12): 2956-2966.
    [24]
    Seh Z W, Kibsgaard J, Dickens C F, et al. Combining theory and experiment in electrocatalysis: Insights into materials design. Science. 2017, 355(6321): d4998.
    [25]
    Jiang H, He Q, Zhang Y, et al. Structural self-reconstruction of catalysts in electrocatalysis. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2018, 51(11): 2968-2977.
    [26]
    Li Y, Du X, Huang J, et al. Recent progress on surface reconstruction of earth-abundant electrocatalysts for water oxidation. Small. 2019, 15(35): 1901980.
    [27]
    Shan J, Zheng Y, Shi B, et al. Regulating electrocatalysts via surface and interface engineering for acidic water electrooxidation. ACS Energy Letters. 2019, 4(11): 2719-2730.
    [28]
    Feng C, Faheem M B, Fu J, et al. Fe-based electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction: progress and perspectives. ACS Catalysis. 2020, 10(7): 4019-4047.
    [29]
    Dionigi F, Strasser P. NiFe-based (Oxy)hydroxide catalysts for oxygen evolution reaction in non-acidic electrolytes. Advanced Energy Materials. 2016, 6(23): 1600621.
    [30]
    Zou S, Burke M S, Kast M G, et al. Fe (Oxy)hydroxide oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysis: Intrinsic activity and the roles of electrical conductivity, substrate, and dissolution. Chemistry of Materials. 2015, 27(23): 8011-8020.
    [31]
    Smith A M, Trotochaud L, Burke M S, et al. Contributions to activity enhancement via Fe incorporation in Ni-(oxy)hydroxide/borate catalysts for near-neutral pH oxygen evolution. Chemical Communications. 2015, 51(25): 5261-5263.
    [32]
    Xu Q, Jiang H, Duan X, et al. Fluorination-enabled reconstruction of NiFe electrocatalysts for efficient water oxidation. Nano Letters. 2021, 21(1): 492-499.
    [33]
    Wang Y, Zhu Y, Zhao S, et al. Anion etching for accessing rapid and deep self-reconstruction of precatalysts for water oxidation. Matter. 2020, 3(6): 2124-2137.
    [34]
    Gao M Y, Sun C B, Lei H, et al. Nitrate-induced and in situ electrochemical activation synthesis of oxygen deficiencies-rich nickel/nickel (oxy)hydroxide hybrid films for enhanced electrocatalytic water splitting. Nanoscale. 2018, 10(37): 17546-17551.
    [35]
    Gao M, Zheng Y, Jiang J, et al. Pyrite-Type Nanomaterials for advanced electrocatalysis. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2017, 50(9): 2194-2204.
    [36]
    You B, Sun Y. Innovative strategies for electrocatalytic water splitting. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2018, 51(7): 1571-1580.
    [37]
    Kuznetsov D A, Han B, Yu Y, et al. Tuning redox transitions via inductive effect in metal oxides and complexes, and implications in oxygen electrocatalysis. Joule. 2018, 2(2): 225-244.
    [38]
    Hu C, Ma Q, Hung S, et al. In Situ Electrochemical production of ultrathin nickel nanosheets for hydrogen evolution electrocatalysis. Chem. 2017, 3(1): 122-133.
    [39]
    Gao J, Xu C, Hung S, et al. Breaking Long-range order in iridium oxide by alkali ion for efficient water oxidation. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2019, 141(7): 3014-3023.
    [40]
    Chen W, Wang H, Li Y, et al. In situ electrochemical oxidation tuning of transition metal disulfides to oxides for enhanced water oxidation. ACS Central Science. 2015, 1(5): 244-251.
    [41]
    Zuo Y, Liu Y, Li J, et al. In situ electrochemical oxidation of Cu2S into CuO nanowires as a durable and efficient electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution reaction. Chemistry of Materials. 2019, 31(18): 7732-7743.
    [42]
    Selvam N C S, Lee J, Choi G H, et al. MXene supported CoxAy (A = OH, P, Se) electrocatalysts for overall water splitting: unveiling the role of anions in intrinsic activity and stability. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2019, 7(48): 27383-27393.
    [43]
    Chen W, Liu Y, Li Y, et al. In situ electrochemically derived nanoporous oxides from transition metal dichalcogenides for active oxygen evolution Catalysts. Nano Letters. 2016, 16(12): 7588-7596.
    [44]
    Liu X, Ni K, Wen B, et al. Deep reconstruction of nickel-based precatalysts for water oxidation catalysis. ACS Energy Letters. 2019, 4(11): 2585-2592.
    [45]
    You B, Sun Y. Hierarchically porous nickel sulfide multifunctional superstructures. Advanced Energy Materials. 2016, 6(7): 1502333.
    [46]
    Qiu Z, Tai C, Niklasson G A, et al. Direct observation of active catalyst surface phases and the effect of dynamic self-optimization in NiFe-layered double hydroxides for alkaline water splitting. Energy & Environmental Science. 2019, 12(2): 572-581.
    [47]
    Pi Y, Xu Y, Li L, et al. Selective surface reconstruction of a defective iridium-based catalyst for high-efficiency water splitting. Advanced Functional Materials. 2020, 30(43): 2004375.
    [48]
    Xu W, Cao D, Moses O A, et al. Probing self-optimization of carbon support in oxygen evolution reaction. Nano Research. 2021.
    [49]
    Sheng B, Cao D, Shou H, et al. Support induced phase engineering toward superior electrocatalyst. Nano Research. 2021.
    [50]
    Li S, Li Z, Ma R, et al. A glass-ceramic with accelerated surface reconstruction toward the efficient oxygen evolution reaction. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2021, 60(7): 3773-3780.
    [51]
    Liu X, Ni K, Wen B, et al. Deep reconstruction of nickel-based precatalysts for water oxidation catalysis. ACS Energy Letters. 2019, 4(11): 2585-2592.
    [52]
    Liu X, Meng J, Ni K, et al. Complete reconstruction of hydrate pre-catalysts for ultrastable water electrolysis in industrial-concentration alkali media. Cell Reports Physical Science. 2020, 1(11): 100241.
    [53]
    Cao D, Sheng B, Qi Z, et al. Self-optimizing iron phosphorus oxide for stable hydrogen evolution at high current. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2021, 298: 120559.
    [54]
    He W, Liberman I, Rozenberg I, et al. Electrochemically driven cation exchange enables the rational design of active CO2 reduction electrocatalysts. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2020, 59(21): 8262-8269.
    [55]
    Wang X T, Ouyang T, Wang L, et al. Surface reorganization on electrochemically-induced Zn-Ni-Co spinel oxides for enhanced oxygen electrocatalysis. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2020, 59(16): 6492-6499.
    [56]
    Li W, Li M, Hu Y, et al. Synchrotron-based X-ray absorption fine structures, X-ray diffraction, and X-ray microscopy techniques applied in the study of lithium secondary batteries. Small Methods. 2018, 2(8): 1700341.
    [57]
    Sun Z, Liu Q, Yao T, et al. X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy in nanomaterials. Science China Materials. 2015, 58(4): 313-341.
    [58]
    Jiang H, He Q, Li X, et al. Tracking structural self-reconstruction and Identifying true active sites toward cobalt oxychloride precatalyst of oxygen evolution reaction. Advanced Materials. 2019, 31(8): 1805127.
    [59]
    Song S, Zhou J, Su X, et al. Operando X-ray spectroscopic tracking of self-reconstruction for anchored nanoparticles as high-performance electrocatalysts towards oxygen evolution. Energy & Environmental Science. 2018, 11(10): 2945-2953.
    [60]
    Xiao Z, Huang Y, Dong C, et al. Operando identification of the dynamic behavior of oxygen vacancy-rich Co3O4 for oxygen evolution reaction. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2020, 142(28): 12087-12095.
    [61]
    Wu T, Sun S, Song J, et al. Iron-facilitated dynamic active-site generation on spinel CoAl2O4 with self-termination of surface reconstruction for water oxidation. Nature Catalysis. 2019, 2(9): 763-772.
    [62]
    Jiang K, Luo M, Peng M, et al. Dynamic active-site generation of atomic iridium stabilized on nanoporous metal phosphides for water oxidation. Nature Communications. 2020, 11(1).
    [63]
    Ye J, Jiang Y, Sheng T, et al. In-situ FTIR spectroscopic studies of electrocatalytic reactions and processes. Nano Energy. 2016, 29: 414-427.
    [64]
    Cheng W, Zhao X, Su H, et al. Lattice-strained metal-organic-framework arrays for bifunctional oxygen electrocatalysis. Nature Energy. 2019, 4(2): 115-122.
    [65]
    Su H, Zhao X, Cheng W, et al. Hetero-N-coordinated Co single sites with high turnover frequency for efficient electrocatalytic oxygen evolution in an acidic medium. ACS Energy Letters. 2019, 4(8): 1816-1822.
    [66]
    Gong Z, Yang Y. The application of synchrotron X-ray techniques to the study of rechargeable batteries. Journal of Energy Chemistry. 2018, 27(6): 1566-1583.
    [67]
    Zhang S, Wang W, Hu F, et al. 2D CoOOH sheet-encapsulated Ni2P into tubular arrays realizing 1000 mA cm-2-level-current-density hydrogen evolution Over 100 h in neutral water. Nano-Micro Letters. 2020, 12(1): 140.
    [68]
    Liu Y, Liang X, Gu L, et al. Corrosion engineering towards efficient oxygen evolution electrodes with stable catalytic activity for over 6000 hours. Nature Communications. 2018, 9(1): 2609.
    Recommended articles
    TrendMD
    Volume 51 Issue 11 page: 787-801
    Cover

    Article Metrics

    Article views (745) PDF downloads(3104)
    Proportional views

    Copyright © Editorial Office of JUSTC, All Rights Reserved. 皖ICP备05002528号

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return